Leaders of Tomorrow? More Like Nerds of Tomorrow
I read yesterday that teens now are having fewer babies, committing less crime, and doing fewer drugs than teens of the 70's. What's up, modern-day teens?! You're comfortable with the 70's teens being more physically attractive, tougher, and open-minded than you? I'm at something of a loss here. I'm a fairly quick study, but I'll admit that even I'm having trouble with this one. Maybe the goal of today's teen is to get a PhD in how to be a nerd, I don't know. Is there a special medal you get now for excelling in academics? I must've missed the memo.
Let me put it simply, in a way that even sexually repulsive teens with no criminal record can understand: Preparing for the future is fine, but not if it means not experimenting with heroin. Abstaining from controlled substances might seem sensible, but I'm going to let you teens in on a little secret--some things are just too good to pass up, heroin being one of them. What's that? No, say it again. It sounded a lot like a nerdy teen whining about the irrepairable destruction of family and personal relationships. In fact, it sounded exactly like that. C'mon, I don't see that happening. There's a possibility (albeit very remote) that your family and friends would continue to speak with you, even as you repeatedly pawn their personal belongings to get high. Plus, some of you are only 13, that's why they call it "experimenting". And some of you are 18, and that's why they call it "a habit". But I'm getting off track. Whatever you want to do is fine. Nothing to be ashamed of. Nothing to be ashamed of at all, if you don't mind being a total loser who's too scared to do coke once in awhile.
Ok, I can see my message is not getting through, which leads me to one conclusion: In addition to being less violent and more conscious of your sexual health than the generation before you, you have almost no reading comprehension skills. So let me try a different tactic. Do you want me to tell all your friends you've never even vandalized anything before, is that it? Is it that you're too good to vandalize something? Trust me, it's not that difficult. I once fire-bombed 2 mobile home parks before breakfast, and I wasn't even trying. And I'm betting the typical 70's teen could do that and more. In the 70's, a typical teen would probably take a short lunch break and rob a 7-11 without even thinking about it, and then use a rocket launcher on another, reducing it to rubble. For fun. Because it was the right thing to do. Today's weak-minded teens (you) would probably stand in the candy aisle for 20 minutes trying to work up the courage to steal some Good N' Plenty's. Also, Good N' Plenty's are disgusting, so you would lose points there as well.
Indeed, the teens of yesteryear could pop out babies like the human race was at stake. By contrast, it seems that today's teens couldn't get pregnant if they went to school naked. In fact, I've seen more promiscuous behavior in an old persons' home, where a majority of the residents are completely dead. Newsflash, teens: Your efforts are pathetic.
To sum up, a lifetime of drug addiction leads to systematic mental and physical decay of the body. Then death, usually alone in an alley. But there’s a chance this might not happen. So I ask: Are you going to be a little baby about it, or are you going to show the 1970’s teens how to party? If current statistics are any indication, you're going to be sitting at home, filling out college applications. And not smoking weed. What am I supposed to say, good job? I don't think so, little nerdlings.
22 Comments:
Wow! What a total wussy generation! Just think these little dogooder losers are one day going to be running our old folk's home. It's sad really! I bet the little SOBs won't even let us get Lavitra and Viagra, because "Those are drugs." To hell with them I say!
Lois Lane
P.S. Good N' Plenty's are by far the most disgusting candy ever made.
erik you posted a public service announcement PLUS a current event? what a consciously minded individual you are. i award you the award for blogger of... stuff. (shipping and handling not included)
p.s. amen to all the good n plenty trash talk. tart n tinys they ain't.
lois-i know! the party's definitely over when these kids take over. luckily, i've been stockpiling the ED drugs for awhile now.
hf, thanks for the award. it was very nice, not to mention extremely specific. fyi, i'm willing to pay any shipping charges. i know it's probably a really big trophy, but i'm telling you--i will pay for everything. i need that trophy.
thank you for posting this most important and cogent current event for us.
also, i'm serving you with a summons tomorrow. my mobile home was fire bombed recently, but thankfully i wasn't there. i hope you know a good lawyer, because i took (and passed) several law school exams last semester.
"i've been stockpiling the ED drugs for awhile now."
So um, Erik, buddy, how 'bout me and you meet up at Running Waters Home For Retired Folk in say, about 40 years? ;)
Lois Lane
My mom was a 70s teen and guess what, I was a 70s baby. HECK YES. OH - and my dad TOTALLY did heroin. Killed robbing a liquor store to support his "habbit" - so yeah. If it weren't for rocking and rolling 70s teens, yours truly wouldn't be here. And we all know what a shame that would be.
very specific awards is evidently my forte.
and i too am a product of the 70's. though my parents weren't so much of the wild-and-crazy variety. but i was born then.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
rebecca, i firmly yet respectfully disagree. of the candies that employ the 'n' phenomenon, i must stand by the tart 'n' tiny... but i don't like CANDY candy all that much. if it is made with chocolate or caramel, it is metacandy and then no longer in the realm of regular candyhood. i do like metacandy quite a bit.
but if we can open the discussion up to candies that do not use 'n' in their name, i like apple jolly ranchers and orange lifesavers cremesavers much better than t'n't's. but not as much as i like cheese which isn't candy.
wow, erik, look at me use your blog to talk about me and what i like. and i didn't even intend to do that!
>look at me use your blog to talk >about me and what i like
please, by all means. as you know, i've been using your blog as my private journal lately. it's been nice to have 2 blogs lately.
very provacative thoughts on candy, everyone. also, i've never thought about candy in terms of regular vs. meta, but i guess that's just another example of how my brain is so small.
haiku girl-it seems like your dad really had it going on. :) thanks for sharing a heroin story i think everyone can idenitify with.
rebecca, i do agree - bites of symphony bars do make for a good day...
today, they were selling meta-metacandybars (chocolate and caramel) in the cafeteria at work to support march of dimes. having worked with preemies and loving it, i felt obliged to support march of dimes. and bought two. THAT'S a good day.
and while i share your distaste for what jolly ranchers do to the inside of your cheek, really the appleyness makes it so worth my while.
i can't tell you how interesting all this i-like-jolly-ranchers-no-i-don't-yes-i-do is.
the reason i can't tell you is i don't know any words that mean negative interestingness.
except for "negative interestingness", i guess.
PS. I wish to state for the record that I have huge crushes* on both rebecca and heatherfeather.
*in a non-sexual, i-love-your-mind kind of way
[nods solemnly] just fascinating.
i had two, count 'em TWO jolly ranchers tonight in class. i have a prof. who thinks giving us candy halfway through the 3 hour class will keep us awake and loving him. it works - he's my favorite and i've never fallen asleep.
he DID have peanut butter cups, but my soon to develop peanut allergy has me revolted by the smell of peanuts or peanut butter in enclosed spaces, so i had the apple j.r's. see? just fascinating.
1. someone get a restraining order on bryan. whoa.
2. what about now-and-laters? remember those? they'd get stuck to your teeth worse than starburst.
rebecca's not letting me talk to her or heatherfeather, so i'll try p-man. pman: bryan's basically been problematic from day 1, and a restraining order is not going to cure whatever it is he's afflicted with. fortunately, i've learned to just go along with what he says, to keep his anger at bay. plus, his crushes are often very short-lived, much like Brick from Anchorman.
"Brick, do you really love lamp, or are you just looking at things around the room and saying you love them?"
how long does a crush have to be? i only need about two minutes...
PS. Since Erik's blog is pretty much for using however we want:
Dear Mr. Particleman,
If you have recommendations for places to eat, listen to music, etc in Austin, please email me (think how important and knowledgeable it would make you feel).
I've been there a few times, really enjoyed 6th street, the warehouse district, etc, but happy for any guidance from a former native.
Thx. For whatever.
-Bryan
(quiller999@aol.com)
at my school, they are building a new structure to house the school of hospitality and tourism. about 100 feet from the building, they have constructed abrick wall approximately 10 feet tall and 6 feet wide. it has a hole in the middle of it like a window.
it's so far from the building that i have yet to figure its purpose. i personally am of the mindset that it is a mystical portal. i had hoped it would go to hogwarts. but i'm pretty sure if you go through the portal ("behold! it is nirvana! the mystical portal awaits!"), you'll wind up on erik's comment page.
man, it's weird here. (mamacita jolly ranchers are usually WAY better than surly ranchers)
bryan - check yer mail.
erik - thankfully, bryan will be taking his ability to crush to austin, where opportunities to have short-lived crushes are plentiful. and by plentiful, i mean that i still have some even though i haven't lived in that place for 3 years. but no, i'm not clingy or anything.
A-hem.. even your partially blind brother has updated his blog. Sheesh you slacker. By the way, don't think I didn't notice how many comments you are racking up by being a slacker. ;)
Lois Lane
i know, that was a pretty pathetic stretch there. not all of us can be as prolific as you, ok? we try, but that's all we can do. :)
Post a Comment
<< Home